Comments for Eugene Hutorny

Comment on Very Low Overhead Operating System by Eugene

Eugene — Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:53:28 +0000

There were en-dashes in place of ???. I remember for sure they were shown properly before. Anyway, I have replaced them with simple dashes.
Thanks for noticing.

Comment on VELOOS Example 1 by Eugene

Eugene — Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:48:34 +0000

Yes, you right, it should be millisecond.

I also overlooked INCLUDE command for linker files. With next revision I’ll consider using INCLUDE in the linker scripts.

Thanks for pointing this out.

Comment on VELOOS Example 1 by edt

edt — Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:15:42 +0000

Have you seen the INCLUDE command for linker files? You could make a vos_pic??.lkr for each family and then you only need to INCLUDE it at the bottom of an existing lkr file.

Comment on VELOOS Example 1 by edt

edt — Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:47:45 +0000

“13 messages per second”
Is that correct, or should that be “millisecond”?

Comment on Very Low Overhead Operating System by edt

edt — Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:25:27 +0000

This is very exciting! I will definitely look into using this.

As a side note, the formatting on this page looks a little messed up. I see in the preface “it drives application design ??? e.g. if a RTOS” and the same “???” in several other places. The “Principle of Operations”, “VELOOS requirements”, and “Possible Extensions” headings overlap with other text for me. It’s not too big a deal, just FYI.

Comment on Very Low Overhead Operating System by Eugene

Eugene — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:22:25 +0000

Revisions:
2006/11/10 – Added links to related posts
2006/11/15 – Added link to Example2
2006/11/20 – Added download link
2006/12/08 – Added link to Example 3 and MIHA675

Comment on SISAM Overview by hutorny

hutorny — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:36:13 +0000

Thanks for pointing, I did not notice this before because IE shows it properly.
Indeed, I did not find yet how to fix that – it seems, this string is autogenerated by the WP engine.

Comment on SISAM Overview by edt

edt — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:44:14 +0000

Oops, I meant instead of “ ”

Comment on SISAM Overview by edt

edt — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:26:26 +0000

Very cool idea. We have an expensive digital scope that can’t log to a file without extra expensive software, so we’re ordering the parts to build one of these. Thanks for providing this all in the public domain!

(BTW, the copyright at the bottom of the page has “ ” instead of “ ”, so it displays the literal)

Comment on Benefits of using e# by edt

edt — Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:01:27 +0000

No, by tools I meant compilers, simulators, in-circuit debuggers, etc. Possibly IDE’s, too, but I wouldn’t consider an IDE a development tool in anywhere near the same sense as those.

VHDL is a cool idea, too.