http://hutorny.in.ua/research/why-assemblers-look-like-they-look Programming in a small Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:19:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 http://hutorny.in.ua/research/why-assemblers-look-like-they-look/comment-page-1#comment-31 Eugene Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:46:12 +0000 http://hutorny.in.ua/research/why-assemblers-look-like-they-look#comment-31 Thanks for pointing out, I'll take a chance to look for them. BTW, may be you know and may advice which one of those is the least of all looking as a 'regualr assembelr'? Thanks for pointing out, I’ll take a chance to look for them.
BTW, may be you know and may advice which one of those is the least of all looking as a ‘regualr assembelr’?

]]> http://hutorny.in.ua/research/why-assemblers-look-like-they-look/comment-page-1#comment-30 dbremner Sat, 02 Sep 2006 14:57:48 +0000 http://hutorny.in.ua/research/why-assemblers-look-like-they-look#comment-30 There have been a fair number of infix assembly languages: Wirth's PL360, PL516, CERN's PL-11 and PL-VAX, Cray's CAL, Jim Neil's Terse, Bell Labs' LIL and SMAL. There have been a fair number of infix assembly languages: Wirth’s PL360, PL516, CERN’s PL-11 and PL-VAX, Cray’s CAL, Jim Neil’s Terse, Bell Labs’ LIL and SMAL.

]]>